I’ve been following some of the conversations around AI and intellectual property, and this caught my attention

Eminem’s longtime music publisher, Eight Mile Style, has sued AI music generator Suno for $41 million over alleged copyright infringement.

The complaint, filed on November 6, 2026, alleges that Suno used 269 of Eminem’s songs to train its AI models without authorisation.

Interestingly, this isn’t an isolated dispute. Rights holders connected to Elvis Presley and major music labels are also challenging how AI companies obtain and use copyrighted music.

Suno maintains that its technology helps people create original music and has relied on the fair use doctrine in defending its training practices.

What I find interesting in all these is that we often talk about what AI can create, but perhaps we should pay more attention to what goes into making those creations possible.

If copyrighted works are used to train AI models, where do the rights of the original creators come in? Also we know of how AI pulls information and resources from everywhere on the web.

And does the argument for technological innovation automatically justify the use of creative works without permission?

I think this is an important conversation for intellectual property law, particularly as generative AI continues to develop.

This is definitely a conversation worth following

✍🏾

Happy weekend, everyone!

source: Reuters